What are the two ways to resolve merge conflicts in Copado?

When resolving merge conflicts in Copado, the two primary methods are automatic resolution and manual resolution.

Automatic resolution involves the tools and mechanisms within Copado that can handle conflicts without the need for user intervention. This typically applies when changes from different developers don't overlap or cause a direct conflict and can be merged without additional user input. This approach is efficient, ensuring that development can proceed quickly while minimizing disruptions.

On the other hand, manual resolution is necessary when conflicts cannot be automatically resolved due to overlapping changes in the code. In such cases, a developer must review the conflicting areas, understand the changes made by different contributors, and decide which version of the code to keep or how to combine them in a way that maintains functionality and preserves the intent of the changes. This method requires careful consideration and testing, as it hinges on the developer's understanding of both sets of changes and their implications for the overall codebase.

Combining these two approaches allows developers to effectively manage and resolve conflicts during the development process, maintaining a smooth workflow even when challenges arise. Other options such as "silently or loudly," "quickly or slowly," and "internally or externally" do not accurately reflect the processes used in version control systems like Copado, making them unsuitable choices